The Efficacy, Safety, and Processing Methodologies of Allogenic Human Amniotic Membrane in Burn and Reconstructive Surgery

Main Article Content

Francisco Javier Velázquez Aranda
Sergio Morales Acosta
Ángel de Jesús Ramos Fuentes
Abraham Saynes Jarquin
Mariana Carolina Zuñiga Garcia
Saúl Xicohténcatl García
Gilberto Luis Juan Baltazar
Juan Pablo Jiménez Torres
Sylvana Cruz Navarro
Irvin Hernández Sánchez
Sofía Alejandra Pinto López

Abstract

Cutaneous thermal injury and extensive soft-tissue losses impose heavy operational and economic loads onto healthcare frameworks worldwide. Traditional treatment paradigms often rely upon frequent, highly distressing dressing applications or autologous skin grafts, which may be significantly constrained by donor-site availability and associated secondary morbidity.Human amniotic membrane (HAM) has re-emerged as an accessible, cost-effective, and highly specialized biologic skin substitute. This review evaluates the structural components, immunology, processing protocols, and clinical outcomes of HAM based on the current peer-reviewed literature. Rigorous statistical findings demonstrate that HAM yields a significantly lower bacterial colonization rate, marked pain relief, compressed healing durations, and reduced metabolic resource expenditure when compared to gold-standard silver sulfadiazine or synthetic dressings. This synthesis serves as a specialized clinical and educational guide for plastic surgery residents optimizing modern wound care pathways.

Article Details

How to Cite
Velázquez Aranda, F. J., Sergio Morales Acosta, Ángel de Jesús Ramos Fuentes, Saynes Jarquin, A., Zuñiga Garcia, M. C., Xicohténcatl García, S., Juan Baltazar , G. L. ., Jiménez Torres , J. P., Cruz Navarro , S., Hernández Sánchez, I. ., & Pinto López , S. A. . (2026). The Efficacy, Safety, and Processing Methodologies of Allogenic Human Amniotic Membrane in Burn and Reconstructive Surgery. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 6(06), 1206–1210. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i6-28
Section
Articles

References

I. Yang C, Xiong AB, He XC, Ding XB, Tian XL, Li Y, Yan H. Efficacy and feasibility of amniotic membrane for the treatment of burn wounds: A meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;90(4):744-755.

II. Kesting MR, Wolff KD, Hohlweg-Majert B, Steinstraesser L. The Role of Allogenic Amniotic Membrane in Burn Treatment. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(6):907-916.

III. Mostaque AK, Rahman KBMA. Comparisons of the Effects of Biological Membrane (Amnion) and Silver Sulfadiazine in theManagement of Burn Wounds in Children. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(2):200-209.

IV. Gajiwala K, Gajiwala AL. Evaluation of lyophilised, gamma-irradiated amnion as a biological dressing. Cell Tissue Bank. 2004;5(2): 73-80.

V. Ravishanker R, Bath AS, Roy R. "Amnion Bank" the use of long term glycerol preserved amniotic membranes in the management of superficial and superficial partial thickness burns. Burns. 2003;29(4):369-374.

VI. Zidan SM, Eleowa SA, Nasef MA, Abd-Almoktader MA, Elbatawy AM, Borhamy AG, Aboliela MA, Ali AM, Algamal MR. Maximizing the safety of glycerol preserved human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing. Burns. 2015;41(7):1498-1503.

VII. Jeschke MG, Shahrokhi S, Finnerty CC, Branski LK, Dibildox M; ABA Organization & Delivery of Burn Care Committee. WoundCoverage Technologies in Burn Care: EstablishedTechniques. J Burn Care Res. 2018;39(3):313-318.

Most read articles by the same author(s)