Cross-Leg Flap: An Effective Alternative for Limb Salvage in Complex Trauma

Main Article Content

Mariana Carolina Zuñiga García
Christian Balaam Rodríguez Monge
Marco Antonio Aldaco Paredes
Brian José Manuel González Ariza
Jorge Alberto Palma Villalba
Jorge Alan Lara Urbina
Williams Antonio Barrios García
Fernando García Mendoza

Abstract

Although microsurgery is the current gold standard for the reconstruction of lower extremity diffects, the cross-leg flap remains vital when free tissue transfers are not feasible (due to vascular compromise, lack of recipient vessels, or limited resources). The technique has evolved since its description in 1854, with notable advancements including the introduction of the fasciocutaneous flap (Ponten, 1983) and the development of microsurgical variants. Its key indications include severe trauma, absence of local vessels supply, previous flap failures, and resource-limited settings. However, there are relative contraindications such as bilateral trauma or lack of patient cooperation.


Among its advantages are its reliability, robustness, independence from local vessels, and technical simplicity. Disadvantages include prolonged immobilization (3-4 weeks), the need for two surgical stages, and potential aesthetic outcomes that may require revisions. Complications vary (necrosis, infection, etc.) but are accompanied by a generally high success rate.


Postoperative management is crucial, focusing on immobilization with external fixators, flap monitoring, pain control, and early physiotherapy. The pedicle is divided once the flap has developed sufficient vascularization (approximately 3-4 weeks).

Article Details

How to Cite
Zuñiga García, M. C. ., Rodríguez Monge, C. B. ., Aldaco Paredes, M. A., González Ariza, B. J. M., Palma Villalba, J. A. ., Lara Urbina, J. A. ., Barrios García, W. A., & Mendoza, F. G. . (2025). Cross-Leg Flap: An Effective Alternative for Limb Salvage in Complex Trauma. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 5(07), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v5-i07-40
Section
Articles

References

I. Sabry, M., Azmy, M. M., & Darwish, A. M. A. A. (2023). Cross-leg flaps: Case series, review, and proposed classification. JPRAS Open, 38, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.09.005

II. Van Boerum, M. S., Wright, T., McFarland, M., Fiander, M., & Pannucci, C. J. (2019). Cross-Leg Flaps for Lower Extremity Salvage: A Scoping Review. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 35(04), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1679955

III. Aguilar Ezquerra, A., Yuste Benavente, V., & Jordán Palomar, E. (2018). La fijación externa en cirugía reconstructiva: Colgajo de piernas cruzadas. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, 75(3), 215-220. https://www.revistafacultadmedica.com/index.php/RFCM/article/view/19731

IV. Agarwal, P., & Raza, H. K. T. (2008). Cross-leg flap: Its role in limb salvage. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 42(4), 439–443.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740343/pdf/IJO-42-439.pdf

V. Shoeib, M. A. (2013). Cross-Leg Flap: Its Reliability and Outcome. Modern Plastic Surgery, 3(1), 9–14.

https://www.scirp.org/pdf/MPS_2013012310165722.pdf

VI. Bali, Z. U., Karatan, B., Tuluy, Y., Kececi, Y., & Yoleri, L. (2020). Preserving the Blood Flow of the Recipient Artery in Cross-Leg Free Flap Procedure for Lower Extremity Reconstruction. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 19(4), 232–238.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620913414

VII. Ciudad, P., Escandón, J. M., Manrique, O. J., Llanca, L., Reynaga, C., & Mayer, H. F. (2023). Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 46(6), 597–607.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02052-6

VIII. Celie, K.-B., Fahradyan, A., Guo, S., Raya, J., Carey, J., & Salibian, A. A. (2024). The cross-leg free flap: A systematic review of the literature. Microsurgery, 44(2), e31144.

Most read articles by the same author(s)