Complex Wound Closure: Surgical Principles, Adjunctive Technologies, And Emerging Strategies
Main Article Content
Abstract
Complex wound closure remains a major challenge in reconstructive surgery because wound healing depends on coordinated cellular, molecular, vascular, infectious, and mechanical factors. Large traumatic defects, chronic wounds, postoperative dehiscence, irradiated wounds, diabetic ulcers, spinal wounds, chest wall defects, and wounds in medically compromised patients frequently fail to heal through standard closure methods. Successful management requires careful assessment of wound etiology, vascularity, contamination, tissue loss, tension, patient comorbidities, and reconstructive goals. Traditional strategies include primary closure, delayed primary closure, secondary intention healing, skin grafting, local tissue rearrangement, and flap reconstruction. Adjunctive modalities such as negative pressure wound therapy, incisional negative pressure therapy, skin stretching systems, dermal matrices, bioengineered scaffolds, and smart dressings have expanded the reconstructive armamentarium. Among these, negative pressure wound therapy has become one of the most widely adopted tools for complex wound management because it stabilizes the wound environment, reduces edema, promotes granulation tissue, and may decrease surgical site complications. However, no single technique is universally appropriate. Complex wound closure should be individualized according to wound biology, patient risk factors, anatomical location, functional demands, and available reconstructive resources. This review summarizes current principles, surgical options, adjunctive technologies, and future directions in complex wound closure.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC. Wound healing: a cellular perspective. Physiological Reviews. 2019;99:665-706. doi:10.1152/physrev.00067.2017
II. Rousselle P, Braye F, Dayan G. Re-epithelialization of adult skin wounds: cellular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.019
III. Mamun A, Shao C, Geng P, Wang S, Xiao J. Recent advances in molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing and its treatments. Frontiers in Immunology. 2024;15. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1395479
IV. Heras K, Igartua M, Santos-Vizcaíno E, Hernández R. Chronic wounds: current status, available strategies and emerging therapeutic solutions. Journal of Controlled Release. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.039
V. Buchanan PJ, Kung TA, Cederna PS. Evidence-based medicine: wound closure. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;138:257S-270S.
doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002775
VI. Mirhaj M, Labbaf S, Tavakoli M, Seifalian A. Emerging treatment strategies in wound care. International Wound Journal. 2022;19:1934-
doi:10.1111/iwj.13786
VII. Agarwal P, Kukrele R, Sharma D. Vacuum assisted closure/VAC/negative pressure wound therapy/NPWT for difficult wounds: a review. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2019;10:845-848.
doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2019.06.015
VIII. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1997;38:563-577.
doi:10.1097/00000637-199706000-00002
IX. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ, Marks MW, DeFranzo AJ, Molnar JA, David LR. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2006;117:127S-142S. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000222551.10793.51
X. Scalise A, Calamita R, Tartaglione C, Pierangeli M, Bolletta E, Gioacchini M, Gesuita R, Di Benedetto G. Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of incisional negative pressure wound therapy. A systematic review of the literature. International Wound Journal. 2016;13. doi:10.1111/iwj.12492
XI. Gadot R, Anand A, Verla T, Muir M, Winocour S, Reece E, Ropper A. Complex wound closure in adult spinal deformity surgery reduces complications in high-risk patients. World Neurosurgery. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.057
XII. Kuris EO, Alsoof D, Lerner J, Woo AS, Daniels AH. Plastic surgery closure of complex spinal wounds. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2023;31:e610-e618. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00129
XIII. O’Connor JV, Kells AF, Henry S, Scalea TM. Vacuum-assisted closure for the treatment of complex chest wounds. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2005;79:1196-1200. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.09.041
XIV. Wu Y, Chen L, Mao X, Ru Z, Yu L, Chen M, Wang J, Chen J, Pang Q. Closure of complex wounds by a simple skin stretching system associated with vacuum sealing drainage: clinical outcome of 34 patients. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2021;22:555-562.
doi:10.1177/15347346211032046
XV. Zhu Y, Pan S, Xu Y, Shi J, Shi Z. The efficacy of modified Ilizarov distraction-tension device on limb wound difficult to cover with skin flaps. Orthopaedic Surgery. 2024;16:2221-2229.
doi:10.1111/os.14217
XVI. Millonig K, Ali A, Bibbo C. Fascial and peri-incision cutaneous meshing for complex soft tissue closure. Foot & Ankle Surgery: Techniques, Reports & Cases. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.fastrc.2021.100061
XVII. Zandi N, Dolatyar B, Lotfi R, Shallageh Y, Shokrgozar MA, Tamjid E, Annabi N, Simchi A. Biomimetic nanoengineered scaffold for enhanced full-thickness cutaneous wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3687902
XVIII. Qin J, Chen F, Wu P, Sun G. Recent advances in bioengineered scaffolds for cutaneous wound healing. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022;10.
doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.841583
XIX. Kolimi P, Narala S, Nyavanandi D, Youssef AAA, Dudhipala N. Innovative treatment strategies to accelerate wound healing: trajectory and recent advancements. Cells. 2022;11.
doi:10.3390/cells11152439
XX. Zhu J, Zhou H, Gerhard E, Zhang S, Rodríguez F, Pan T, Yang H, Lin Y, Yang J, Cheng H. Smart bioadhesives for wound healing and closure. Bioactive Materials. 2022;19:360-375. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.04.020
XXI. Jiang Y, Trotsyuk AA, Niu S, Henn D, Chen K, Shih CC, Larson MR, et al. Wireless, closed-loop, smart bandage with integrated sensors and stimulators for advanced wound care and accelerated healing. Nature Biotechnology. 2023;41:652-662. doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01528-3
XXII. Wang C, Sani ES, Shih CC, Lim CT, Wang J, Armstrong DG, Gao W. Wound management materials and technologies from bench to bedside and beyond. Nature Reviews Materials. 2024;9:550-566. doi:10.1038/s41578-024-00693-y
XXIII. Song J, Ryu H, Bai W, Xie Z, Vázquez-Guardado A, Nandoliya K, Avila R, et al. Bioresorbable, wireless, and battery-free system for electrotherapy and impedance sensing at wound sites. Science Advances. 2023;9. doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade4687
XXIV. Clark A, Sherrer J, Grover K, Shauly O, Gould DJ, Losken A. Efficacy of vacuum-assisted wound closure in improving healing in breast surgery patients: a review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2025;13. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006979
XXV. Lazarus E, Barnum L, Ramesh S, Quint J, Samandari M, Laflamme S, Secord T, et al. Engineering tools for stimulating wound healing. Applied Physics Reviews. 2024. doi:10.1063/5.0173663