Prognostic Implications of Discordant Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Diagnostic Challenges, and Clinical Outcomes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Discordant low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (DLG-SAS) represents a clinically complex and prognostically heterogeneous entity characterized by a discrepancy between aortic valve area (AVA) criteria for severe stenosis (AVA <1.0 cm²) and a non-classical transvalvular gradient (mean gradient <40 mmHg). This condition poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas due to its multifactorial pathophysiology, which includes impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function (classical low-flow, low-gradient SAS), preserved LV ejection fraction with paradoxical low-flow states, and measurement artifacts. Emerging evidence suggests that DLG-SAS carries distinct prognostic implications, with varying mortality risks depending on underlying hemodynamic profiles, comorbidities, and therapeutic interventions. This review synthesizes current literature on the pathophysiological substrates, advanced imaging modalities (e.g., dobutamine stress echocardiography, computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification scoring), and risk stratification paradigms. Furthermore, we evaluate the impact of treatment strategies, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), on long-term outcomes. By elucidating the interplay between hemodynamic parameters, myocardial remodeling, and clinical trajectories, this article aims to refine prognostic assessment and guide evidence-based management of DLG-SAS.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. S.S. Virani, A. Alonso, E.J. Benjamin, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation, 141 (9) (2020), pp. E139-e596
II. C.M. Otto, R.A. Nishimura, R.O. Bonow, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol, 77 (2021), pp. E25-e197
III. A. Vahanian, F. Beyersdorf, F. Praz, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease Eur Heat J, 43 (7) (2022), pp. 561-632
IV. H.M. Connolly, J.K. Oh, H.V. Shaff, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction Circulation, 101 (2000), pp. 1940-1946
V. Z. Hachicha, J.G. Dumesnil, P. Bogaty, P. Pibarot Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation, 115 (2007), pp. 2856-2864
VI. J.G. Dumesnil, P. Pibarot, B. Carabello Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment Eur Heart J, 31 (2010), pp. 281-289
VII. M.-A. Clavel, J.G. Dumesnil, R. Capoulde, P. Mathieu, M. Sénéchal, P. Pibarot Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction J Am Coll Cardiol, 60 (2012), pp. 1259-1267
VIII. S. Herrmann, S. Störk, M. Niemann, et al. Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcomeJ Am Coll Cardiol, 58 (2011), pp. 402-412
IX. J. Adda, C. Mielot, R. Giorgi, et al. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 5 (2012), pp. 27-35
X. M.F. Eleid, P. Sorajja, H.I. Michelena, J.F. Malouf, C.G. Scott, P.A. Pellika Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Clinical characteristics and predictors of survival Circulation, 128 (2013), pp. 1781-1789
XI. C. Tribouilloy, D. Rusinaru, S. Maréchaux, et al. Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery J Am Coll Cardiol, 65 (2015), pp. 55-66
XII. F. Maes, J. Boulif, S. Piérard, et al.Natural history of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 7 (2014), pp. 714-722
XIII. G. Barone-Rochette, S. Piérard, S. Seldrum, et al. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 6 (2013), pp. 1009-1017
XIV. N. Jander, J. Minners, I. Holme, et al. Outcome of patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction Circulation, 123 (2011), pp. 887-895
XV. M.E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K.L. Ales, C.R. MacKenzie A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis, 40 (1987), pp. 373-383